Professor Julie Hill discusses banking regulations and provides recommendations in a recent issue of Credit Union Times Magazine.
Hill’s new 83-page study, “When Bank Examiners Get It Wrong: Financial Institution Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations” provides in-depth analysis of the appeals process among financial regulatory agencies.
“In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, I was practicing law [in Washington] and started hearing from banks that they were unhappy with their examination ratings,” Hill said. “I realized that it had been 20 years since the Congressional mandate for an appeals process was passed and thought it might be a good time to see what kind of progress had been made.”
For more, read “Blaine, Renz React to NCUA Appeals Record.”
