Course Assignments and Cancellations
|Legislation (Attachment 1 | 2 | 3 )||Spruell||October 24, 2014|
The below assignment and attachments were posted on 10/17/2014 for your record of assignments through November:
1). To confirm for your calendar, our class will meet (10/23) and not meet on October 30, 2014, due to the Law School Fall Break on October 30 & 31, 2014. Our remaining classes after Fall Break will be November 6th, 13th and 20th. I plan to also review the format of our exam in class and make sure everyone understands the rules/procedures for a "floating exam." (I am confirming those this week myself to be sure I relate this correctly to you.)
2). Your assignment for ( 10/23) is as follows:
- Continue to review proposed AL Constitutional Amendment #1, as we discussed at the end of class last night. How would a Court apply the provisions of this Amendment to issues we have already discussed and reviewed during this semester?
-As you review that proposed AL amendment, please also read the 5th Circuit decision in Adar v. Smith. I have attached that opinion for your review. (I provided a summary regarding this case last week.) I thought you would also benefit from the Amicus brief filed in this case by the Eagle Forum & Legal Defense fund. Please review these items and be prepared to discuss in class next week.
-Consider also what impact the Dental Board case may have on issues like noncompete laws within each state; I was glad Brad brought that issue into our discussion last night. See attached the case of Sylvan v. Gulf Coast Ed. and AL Code Section 8-1-1 (1975, as amended.) Please also review Sylvan Learning v. Learning Solutions, 795 F.Supp.2d 1284 (S.D. Ala. 2011) in regards to the non-compete clause issue.
3). The class assignments for November will involve review of various states' legislation regarding the following topics:
-voter ID laws from various states;
-"gun control" legislation on the federal and state level (I place "gun control" in quotations because the issues are really gun permit and ownership laws and regulations. )
There will be no other case assignments for our class this semester.
4). Finally, to circle back to the discussion on 10/16 on the constitutionality of the local act I requested you review, I would like for you to continue to consider who has standing to raise issues regarding the constitutionality of legislation. For the Pension Board Act, we reviewed possible groups or individuals who could raise the issue in court if the Governor signed the Act into law. We discussed the ability of the administrator(s) who were required to implement the Pension Act seeking Declaratory review of the constitutionality of the Act as passed (and amended after publication.) We also discussed what individuals and/or taxpayers would have standing to bring an action to test the Act's constitutionality.
As always, please do not hesitate to let me know if you have any questions or concerns.